Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8vsTesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model 3
Performance 80.5 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,655 kg3,649 lb
- Best power-to-weight308 hp/t230 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Most powerful513 hp383 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 513hp383kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,856kg4,092lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,305kg5,082lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 34.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 28.5s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.1s Calculated | 9.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 11.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 308hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 276hp/t206kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 423Nm/t283lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Estimated range | 786km488mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | - |
| Length | 4,756mm187in | 4,694mm185in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,849mm73in |
| Height | 1,426mm56in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,875mm113in |
| Front track | 1,609mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 425L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 195g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.1 s | 9.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 9.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 11.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 127 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | 513 hp 383 kW |
Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 and Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh: 3 hp (2 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | 1,856 kg 4,092 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | 261 km/h 162 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 4.0 s |
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | 3.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | 513 hp 383 kW | 3.4 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 63 S V8 | TeslaModel 3Performance 80.5 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 513 hp 383 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 261 km/h 162 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,856 kg 4,092 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 786 km 488 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 195 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 308 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 276 hp/t 206 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 63 S V8
- Is 201 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Tesla Model 3 Performance 80.5 kWh
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























