Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful347 hp259 kW
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range631 km392 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 347hp259kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 28.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km329mi Calculated | 631km392mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,516mm178in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,723mm68in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,387mm55in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,509mm59in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 28.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 has 163 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: 163 hp (122 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 5.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 2.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: 5.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 530 km 329 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 631 km 392 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.6 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 347 hp 259 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 329 mi | 631 km 392 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8
- Has 163 hp more
- Has 210 Nm more
- Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 36 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Has 96 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Uses 5.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 101 km (63 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























