Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,115kg4,663lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 27.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 872km542mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,606cc220cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,487mm177in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,385mm55in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 41L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,400-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 27.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 170 hp 127 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 has 110 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 110 hp (82 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.5 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 872 km 542 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Has 110 hp more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 66 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 220d
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























