Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8vsMercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010
AMG CL 63 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8
- Most powerful544 hp406 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range857 km533 mi
- Best overall score75/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,730 kg3,814 lb
- Best power-to-weight293 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Best performance score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 544hp406kW |
| Torque | 610Nm450lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,585kg5,699lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 62.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 59.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 264hp/t197kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 353Nm/t236lb-ft/ton Calculated | 388Nm/t260lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 550km342mi Calculated | 857km533mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 5,461cc333cu in |
| Length | - | 5,106mm201in |
| Width | - | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | - | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,955mm116in |
| Front track | - | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 131mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 490L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 280g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 | 5,250-5,750 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 15.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 120 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 | 544 hp 406 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8 has 37 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8: 37 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 | 4.5 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 550 km 342 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 | 857 km 533 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 | 544 hp 406 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 63 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 544 hp 406 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 550 km 342 mi | 857 km 533 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 280 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 264 hp/t 197 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 63 V8
- Has 37 hp more
- Has 190 Nm more
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 307 km (191 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























