Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018 C 180 1.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018
C 180 1.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Highest torque610 Nm450 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight293 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score85/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.5
- Lightest1,480 kg3,263 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range612 km380 mi
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 610Nm450lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 102.2s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 44.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 353Nm/t236lb-ft/ton Calculated | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 550km342mi Calculated | 612km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,208cc379cu in | 1,497cc91cu in |
| Length | - | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | - | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | - | 1,405mm55in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,551mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 380L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | 280g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 | 5,300 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 44.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 120 mph | 141 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 has 351 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.5.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.5 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 351 hp (262 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.5: 4.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.5 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: 5.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 | 105 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 550 km 342 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 | 612 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.9 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 | 105 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 180 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 550 km 342 mi | 612 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 280 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Has 351 hp more
- Has 360 Nm more
- Is 4.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 72 km/h (45 mph) higher top speed
- Has 188 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 C 180 1.5
- Is 250 kg lighter
- Uses 5.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 62 km (38 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























