Car comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2021-2023
VS

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain

C 220d

200 hp1993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    232 km/h
    144 mph
  • Lightest
    1,696 kg
    3,739 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    112 hp/t
    84 kW/t
    8.9 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    825 km
    513 mi
  • Largest trunk
    660 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d

  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    440 Nm
    325 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
Power
190hp142kW
200hp149kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight
1,696kg3,739lb
1,800kg3,968lb
Gross weight
2,168kg4,780lb
2,400kg5,291lb
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
80.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
78.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
31.6s
Calculated
31.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
825km513mi
Calculated
714km444mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,993cc122cu in
Length
4,862mm191in
4,755mm187in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,477mm58in
1,494mm59in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,584mm62in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,582mm62in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
-
Trunk volume
660L
490L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
1,510L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
40L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220dPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d4,200 rpm1,800-2,800 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.6 s
31.5 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d has 10 hp more than Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
440 Nm
325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
1,696 kg
3,739 lb
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
1,800 kg
3,968 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
232 km/h
144 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
231 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d has more power, Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d and Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: 2.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.8 s
232 km/h
144 mph
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
200 hp
149 kW
7.8 s
231 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.8 s
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
7.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.8 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
231 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,696 kg
3,739 lb
1,800 kg
3,968 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Range score
825 km
513 mi
714 km
444 mi
Trunk score
660 L
23.3 cu ft
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km9.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi15.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal840 L222 US gal185 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,470 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI

  • Is 104 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 111 km (69 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 170 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI vs Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d - car comparison - FastVsFaster