Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220dvsSkoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain

C 220d

200 hp1993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2021-present
VS

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,294 km
    804 mi
  • Largest trunk
    660 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d

  • Fastest top speed
    231 km/h
    144 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    440 Nm
    325 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,800 kg
    3,968 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    111 hp/t
    83 kW/t
    9.0 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200hp149kW
200hp149kW
Torque
440Nm325lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,800kg3,968lb
1,807kg3,984lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,280kg5,027lb
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
To 99% top speed
78.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
74.1s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
31.5s
Calculated
31.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton
Calculated
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
714km444mi
Calculated
1,294km804mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,993cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,755mm187in
4,862mm191in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,864mm73in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,476mm58in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,841mm112in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,584mm62in
Rear track
1,582mm62in
1,572mm62in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume
490L
660L
Max trunk volume
1,510L
1,950L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
40L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220dSkoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d4,200 rpm1,800-2,800 rpm4,450 rpm
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI3,600-4,100 rpm1,750-3,500 rpm4,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.5 s
31.3 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
200 hp
149 kW
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
1,800 kg
3,968 lb
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,807 kg
3,984 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
231 km/h
144 mph
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
227 km/h
141 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d7.8 s
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI7.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
714 km
444 mi
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,294 km
804 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
200 hp
149 kW
7.8 s
231 km/h
144 mph
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.3 s
227 km/h
141 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,476 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
7.8 s
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.3 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Lightness
1,800 kg
3,968 lb
1,807 kg
3,984 lb
Fuel consumption
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
490 L
17.3 cu ft
Length
4,755 mm
187.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,476 mm
58.1 in
Range score
714 km
444 mi
1,294 km
804 mi
Trunk score
490 L
17.3 cu ft
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220dSkoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
Consumption5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.80 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.77 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used840 L222 US gal185 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,470 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 7 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 580 km (360 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 170 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 220d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VIII Alltrack2.0 TDI
C 220d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
C 220d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0 TDI
C 200
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
C 220d
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d
2.0 TDI
2.0d
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
C 220d
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d
2.0 TDI
320d
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsBMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d
C 220d
CLA 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220dvsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220d
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 allroad (C8)40 TDI
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d vs Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster