Car comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0dvsSkoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2024
VS

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,795 kg
    3,957 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    114 hp/t
    85 kW/t
    8.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    716 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
204hp152kW
200hp149kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,795kg3,957lb
1,807kg3,984lb
Gross weight-
2,280kg5,027lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
227 km/h
141 mph
To 99% top speed
82.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
74.1s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
29.2s
Calculated
31.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,138km707mi
Calculated
1,294km804mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,964mm195in
4,862mm191in
Width-
1,864mm73in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,476mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,841mm112in
Front track
1,602mm63in
1,584mm62in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,572mm62in
Ground clearance-
136mm5in
Trunk volume
716L
660L
Max trunk volume
1,695L
1,950L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dSkoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d4,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI3,600-4,100 rpm1,750-3,500 rpm4,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.2 s
31.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
227 km/h
141 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 4 hp more than Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,807 kg
3,984 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
227 km/h
141 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1,138 km
707 mi
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,294 km
804 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.3 s
227 km/h
141 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
716 L
25.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,476 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.8 s
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0dSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Lightness
1,795 kg
3,957 lb
1,807 kg
3,984 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
716 L
25.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,476 mm
58.1 in
Range score
1,138 km
707 mi
1,294 km
804 mi
Trunk score
716 L
25.3 cu ft
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0dSkoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 12 kg lighter
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 56 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 156 km (97 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0d vs Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster