Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200vsMercedes-Benz S124 · Facelift 1989 320 TE
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz S124 · Facelift 1989
320 TE
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 320 TE
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque310 Nm229 lb-ft
- Lightest1,590 kg3,505 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989320 TE |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,590kg3,505lb |
| Gross weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.9s Calculated | 32.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,496cc91cu in | 3,199cc195cu in |
| Length | 4,755mm187in | 4,765mm188in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,740mm69in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,489mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,497mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,582mm62in | 1,497mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 320 TE: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989320 TE | 5,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989320 TE |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.9 s | 32.1 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 95 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989320 TE | 220 hp 164 kW |
Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 320 TE has 16 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 and Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 320 TE: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989320 TE | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989320 TE | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989320 TE | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989320 TE | 8.0 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 320 TE has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 and Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 320 TE: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989320 TE | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989320 TE | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989320 TE |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989320 TE | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 320 TE
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























