Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300vsMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range971 km603 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score89/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.4s Calculated | 29.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 971km603mi Calculated | 658km409mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,496cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,755mm187in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,582mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,510L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 154g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.4 s | 29.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 245 hp 183 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 has 41 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 5.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 1.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 971 km 603 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 658 km 409 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 971 km 603 mi | 658 km 409 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 154 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 265 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 50 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 313 km (194 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























