Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions154 g/km
- Best estimated range971 km603 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t145 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score63/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,095kg4,619lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 59.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.6s Calculated | 18.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km329mi Calculated | 971km603mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,266cc260cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,516mm178in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,723mm68in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,387mm55in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,509mm59in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 280g/km | 154g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 5,850 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 6,100 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.6 s | 18.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8 has 61 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8: 61 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 5.9 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8: 4.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 530 km 329 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 971 km 603 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 306 hp 228 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 43 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 329 mi | 971 km 603 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 280 g/km | 154 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 43 V8
- Has 61 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 300
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 441 km (274 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
- Emits 126 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























