Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8vsPorsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)

63 V8

585 hp3982 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2023-present
VS

Porsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023

GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8

599 hp3996 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph
  • Highest torque
    800 Nm
    590 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,895 kg
    4,178 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    309 hp/t
    230 kW/t
    3.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best performance score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
Power
585hp436kW
599hp447kW
Torque
800Nm590lb-ft
800Nm590lb-ft
Curb weight
1,895kg4,178lb
2,495kg5,501lb
Gross weight-
2,935kg6,471lb
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
To 99% top speed
50.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
70.0s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.2s
3.6s
0-200 km/h
9.4s
Calculated
11.9s
0-60 mph
3.1s
Calculated
3.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
1.9L/100 km123.8mpg US148.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.8s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
309hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb
Calculated
240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton
Calculated
321Nm/t215lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
496km308mi
Calculated
3,684km2,289mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
3,996cc244cu in
Length
4,728mm186in
4,930mm194in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,995mm79in
Height
1,354mm53in
1,652mm65in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,895mm114in
Front track
1,683mm66in
-
Rear track
1,686mm66in
-
Ground clearance-
231mm9in
Trunk volume
321L
404L
Max trunk volume
675L
1,344L
Doors
3
5
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
70L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: Power / Torque
  • Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V85,500-6,500 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V86,000 rpm2,400-4,500 rpm6,800 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.1 s
3.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.2 s
3.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.4 s
11.9 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.8 s
5.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.1 s
7.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.2 s
9.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.8 s
11.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
215 km/h
134 mph
197 km/h
123 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 and Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
800 Nm
590 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
1,895 kg
4,178 lb
PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
2,495 kg
5,501 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
315 km/h
196 mph
PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
305 km/h
190 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 and Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
1.9 L/100 km
123.8 mpg US
148.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: 12.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
309 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
240 hp/t
179 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
496 km
308 mi
PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
3,684 km
2,289 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
585 hp
436 kW
3.2 s
315 km/h
196 mph
PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
599 hp
447 kW
3.6 s
305 km/h
190 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Power
585 hp
436 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in
PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
Power
599 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
4 seats
Trunk
404 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,930 mm
194.1 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Power
585 hp
436 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
Power
599 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
305 km/h
190 mph
1.9 L/100 km
123.8 mpg US
148.7 mpg UK

Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
3.2 s
PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
1.9 L/100 km
123.8 mpg US
148.7 mpg UK
3.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
309 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
240 hp/t
179 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
1.9 L/100 km
123.8 mpg US
148.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
Power
585 hp
436 kW
599 hp
447 kW
Torque
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.2 s
3.6 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
305 km/h
190 mph
Lightness
1,895 kg
4,178 lb
2,495 kg
5,501 lb
Fuel consumption
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
1.9 L/100 km
123.8 mpg US
148.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
4 seats
Trunk
404 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,930 mm
194.1 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Range score
496 km
308 mi
3,684 km
2,289 mi
Trunk score
321 L
11.3 cu ft
404 L
14.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
309 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
240 hp/t
179 kW/t
4.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
Consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK1.9 L/100 km123.8 mpg US148.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km24.68 LC100 km3.32 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi39.71 LC100 mi5.35 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal285 L75 US gal63 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,701 LC/year498.75 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8

  • Is 600 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 69 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Uses 12.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3,188 km (1,981 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 83 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
Porsche Cayenne III GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 vs Porsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023 GT-Paket Turbo 4.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster