Car comparison

Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8vsMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche 911 (992)

Turbo 3.8

580 hp3745 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2020-2024
VS

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)

63 V8

585 hp3982 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCoupe2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    330 km/h
    205 mph Unrestricted
    320 km/h
    199 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,640 kg
    3,616 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    354 hp/t
    264 kW/t
    2.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    604 km
    375 mi
  • Best performance score
    94/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Power
580hp433kW
585hp436kW
Torque
750Nm553lb-ft
800Nm590lb-ft
Curb weight
1,640kg3,616lb
1,895kg4,178lb
Gross weight
2,040kg4,497lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Calculated
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
78.8s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph
Calculated
50.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.8s
3.2s
0-200 km/h
9.7s
9.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.7s
Calculated
3.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
10.7s
Calculated
10.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
354hp/t264kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
309hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
457Nm/t306lb-ft/ton
Calculated
422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
604km375mi
Calculated
496km308mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,745cc229cu in
3,982cc243cu in
Length
4,535mm179in
4,728mm186in
Width
1,900mm75in
1,984mm78in
Height
1,303mm51in
1,354mm53in
Wheelbase
2,450mm96in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,583mm62in
1,683mm66in
Rear track
1,600mm63in
1,686mm66in
Trunk volume
264L
321L
Max trunk volume-
675L
Doors
2
3
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
67L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8PowerTorque
  • Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.86,500 rpm2,250-4,500 rpm7,200 rpm
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V85,500-6,500 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.7 s
3.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.8 s
3.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.7 s
9.4 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
59.2 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Likely limited
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.6 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.5 s
4.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.8 s
7.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.9 s
9.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.7 s
10.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
209 km/h
130 mph
215 km/h
134 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
580 hp
433 kW
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
585 hp
436 kW

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 has 5 hp more than Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
800 Nm
590 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
1,895 kg
4,178 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.82.8 s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V83.2 s

Although Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 has more power, Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: 3.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
354 hp/t
264 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
309 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
604 km
375 mi
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
496 km
308 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
580 hp
433 kW
2.8 s
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
585 hp
436 kW
3.2 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
Power
580 hp
433 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,303 mm
51.3 in
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Power
585 hp
436 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
Power
580 hp
433 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Power
585 hp
436 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK

Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
2.8 s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
3.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8
354 hp/t
264 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
309 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8
Power
580 hp
433 kW
585 hp
436 kW
Torque
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.8 s
3.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
330 km/h205 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,640 kg
3,616 lb
1,895 kg
4,178 lb
Fuel consumption
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
14.1 L/100 km
16.7 mpg US
20.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
264 L
9.3 cu ft
Length
4,535 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,303 mm
51.3 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Length
4,728 mm
186.1 in
Height
1,354 mm
53.3 in
Range score
604 km
375 mi
496 km
308 mi
Trunk score
264 L
9.3 cu ft
321 L
11.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
354 hp/t
264 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
309 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
Consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.43 LC100 km24.68 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.26 LC100 mi39.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,914 LC/year3,701 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8

  • Is 255 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 107 km (67 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 57 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Turbo 3.8
Turbo S 3.6
VS
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8vsPorsche911 (992)Facelift 2024Turbo S 3.6
63 V8
R 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017R 4.0 V8
Turbo 3.8
Turbo S 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8vsPorsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8
63 V8
S 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8
Turbo 3.8
Turbo S 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8vsPorsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
63 V8
C 4.0 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8vsMercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)C 4.0 V8
Turbo 3.8
3.0
VS
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8vsPorsche911 Dakar (992)3.0
63 V8
AMG GLE 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)AMG GLE 63 S V8
Turbo 3.8
Turbo 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8vsPorsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo 3.8
63 V8
AMG GLE 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C167)Facelift 2023AMG GLE 63 S V8
Turbo 3.8
Turbo S 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (992)Turbo 3.8vsPorsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo S 3.8
63 V8
AMG C 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 S V8
Porsche 911 (992) Turbo 3.8 vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster