Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8vsMercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190)
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful585 hp436 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight309 hp/t230 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk321 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range691 km430 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 585hp436kW | 476hp355kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,940kg4,277lb |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 50.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 61.8s99% target: 299 km/h / 186 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.2s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.4s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.1s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.8s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 309hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 298hp/t223kW/t135hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 496km308mi Calculated | 691km430mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,728mm186in | 4,544mm179in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 1,939mm76in |
| Height | 1,354mm53in | 1,259mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,683mm66in | 1,684mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,686mm66in | 1,651mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 321L | 165L |
| Max trunk volume | 675L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 219g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.1 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.2 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.4 s | 12.2 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.8 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.1 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.2 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.8 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 215 km/h 134 mph | 197 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 585 hp 436 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 has 109 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: 109 hp (81 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 302 km/h 188 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 3.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8: 4.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 298 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 496 km 308 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 691 km 430 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 585 hp 436 kW | 3.2 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.0 s | 302 km/h 188 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 3.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | 298 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)63 V8 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT Roadster (R190)4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 585 hp 436 kW | 476 hp 355 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.2 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 302 km/h 188 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 496 km 308 mi | 691 km 430 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 219 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | 165 L 5.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 309 hp/t 230 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 298 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8 | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.68 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,701 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 63 V8
- Has 109 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 156 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT Roadster (R190) 4.0 V8
- Is 300 kg lighter
- Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 195 km (121 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























