Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) · Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8vsSpyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSpyker C8 Preliator
4.2 V8 40V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed325 km/h202 mph Unrestricted310 km/h193 mph Restricted
- Highest torque670 Nm494 lb-ft
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight378 hp/t282 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 522hp389kW | 525hp391kW |
| Torque | 670Nm494lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.3s99% target: 322 km/h / 200 mph Calculated | 49.9s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.5s Calculated | 10.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 332hp/t248kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated | 378hp/t282kW/t171hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 427Nm/t286lb-ft/ton Calculated | 432Nm/t289lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 677km421mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 4,172cc255cu in |
| Length | 4,544mm179in | 4,628mm182in |
| Width | - | 1,953mm77in |
| Height | 1,287mm51in | 1,202mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,725mm107in |
| Front track | 1,684mm66in | 1,625mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,645mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 96mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 120L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | 224g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 6,800 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.5 s | 10.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 56.7 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 210 km/h 130 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 522 hp 389 kW |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 525 hp 391 kW |
Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8 and Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 670 Nm 494 lb-ft |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 322 km/h 200 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 3.8 s |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 332 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | 522 hp 389 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 525 hp 391 kW | 3.7 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)Facelift 2017S 4.0 V8 | SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 522 hp 389 kW | 525 hp 391 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 670 Nm 494 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 677 km 421 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 224 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 332 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) Facelift 2017 S 4.0 V8
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 180 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























