Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 TurbovsToyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Auris I
2.2 D-4D
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Lightest1,305 kg2,877 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range887 km551 mi
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,305kg2,877lb | 1,435kg3,164lb |
| Gross weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 88.4s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 85.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.1s Calculated | 40.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 684km425mi Calculated | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,034cc124cu in | 2,231cc136cu in |
| Length | 3,838mm151in | 4,220mm166in |
| Width | 1,764mm69in | 1,760mm69in |
| Height | 1,595mm63in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,568mm101in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,522mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 354L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,995L | 761L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: Power / Torque
- Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 5,000 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 3,600 rpm | 2,000-2,600 rpm | 3,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.1 s | 40.1 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 177 hp 132 kW |
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo has 16 hp more than Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D and Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 8.0 s |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo and Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D and Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 684 km 425 mi |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 887 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 193 hp 144 kW | 8.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzA-class (W169)A 200 Turbo | ToyotaAuris I2.2 D-4D | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 684 km 425 mi | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 354 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo | Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz A-class (W169) A 200 Turbo
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 81 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Toyota Auris I 2.2 D-4D
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 204 km (126 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























