Volkswagen Touareg II (7P)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6vsMazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-7
2.3 DISI Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range859 km534 mi
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,740 kg3,836 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,103kg4,636lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Gross weight | 2,800kg6,173lb | 2,301kg5,073lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 103.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 87.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.0s Calculated | 40.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 171Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 859km534mi Calculated | 676km420mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,597cc220cu in | 2,261cc138cu in |
| Length | 4,795mm189in | 4,675mm184in |
| Width | 1,940mm76in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,709mm67in | 1,645mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,893mm114in | 2,750mm108in |
| Front track | 1,656mm65in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,676mm66in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 580L | 455L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,642L | 774L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 69L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 6,200 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.0 s | 40.5 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 260 hp 194 kW |
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6 has 20 hp more than Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo and Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 2,103 kg 4,636 lb |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 7.8 s |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6 and Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 859 km 534 mi |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 676 km 420 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 280 hp 209 kW | 7.8 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 260 hp 194 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)3.6 FSI V6 | MazdaCX-72.3 DISI Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,103 kg 4,636 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 859 km 534 mi | 676 km 420 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6 | Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) 3.6 FSI V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 182 km (113 mi) more estimated range
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mazda CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 363 kg lighter
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























