Toyota RAV4 V
Car comparison
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5vsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda CX-30
2.0 Skyactiv-X
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque243 Nm179 lb-ft
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
- Lightest1,491 kg3,287 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions118 g/km
- Best estimated range981 km609 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 243Nm179lb-ft | 224Nm165lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,491kg3,287lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 79.2s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 53.0s Calculated | 66.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton Calculated | 150Nm/t101lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 764km475mi Calculated | 981km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,487cc152cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,600mm181in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,690mm67in | 1,540mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,655mm105in |
| Front track | 1,600mm63in | 1,565mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 580L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,406L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 163g/km | 118g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: Power / Torque
- Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 6,600 rpm | 4,000-5,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 6,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 53.0 s | 66.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 180 hp 134 kW |
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 has 20 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 243 Nm 179 lb-ft |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 224 Nm 165 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 1,491 kg 3,287 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 8.5 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 764 km 475 mi |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 981 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.8 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 243 Nm 179 lb-ft | 224 Nm 165 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,491 kg 3,287 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 764 km 475 mi | 981 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 163 g/km | 118 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 | Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 19 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
- Is 194 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 217 km (135 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 45 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























