Car comparison

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechvsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II)

1.6 PureTech

181 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2021
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Skyactiv-X

180 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    181 hp
    135 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,429 kg
    3,150 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    127 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    520 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    981 km
    609 mi
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
181hp135kW
180hp134kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
224Nm165lb-ft
Curb weight
1,429kg3,150lb
1,491kg3,287lb
Gross weight
1,970kg4,343lb
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
83.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
79.2s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
38.0s
Calculated
66.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
150Nm/t101lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
679km422mi
Calculated
981km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,447mm175in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,601mm63in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
219mm9in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
520L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,482L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
53L
51L
CO2 emissions-
118g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XPowerTorque
  • Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech5,500 rpm1,750 rpm5,750 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X6,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.0 s
66.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
181 hp
135 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech has 1 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
224 Nm
165 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1,491 kg
3,287 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
222 km/h
138 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech8.0 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
679 km
422 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
981 km
609 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
181 hp
135 kW
8.0 s
222 km/h
138 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
8.8 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,447 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
8.0 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
181 hp
135 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
8.8 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
1,491 kg
3,287 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,447 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
679 km
422 mi
981 km
609 mi
CO2 score
-
118 g/km
Trunk score
520 L
18.4 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePeugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Has 26 Nm more
  • Is 62 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 90 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 301 km (187 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 PureTech
1.2 PureTech
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1.6 PureTech
20d
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsBMWX2 (F39)20d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1.6 PureTech
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1.6 PureTech
GLB 220d
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
1.6 PureTech
1.2
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsPeugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2
2.0 Skyactiv-X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
1.6 PureTech
Cooper S 2.0
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0
2.0 Skyactiv-X
20d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsJaguarF-Pace20d
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X - car comparison - FastVsFaster