Car comparison

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II)

1.6 PureTech

181 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2021
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,429 kg
    3,150 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    127 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    520 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Most powerful
    186 hp
    139 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    836 km
    520 mi
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
181hp135kW
186hp139kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,429kg3,150lb
1,490kg3,285lb
Gross weight
1,970kg4,343lb
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
83.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
77.6s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.0s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
38.0s
Calculated
64.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
679km422mi
Calculated
836km520mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,447mm175in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,601mm63in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
219mm9in
180mm7in
Trunk volume
520L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,482L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
53L
51L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XPowerTorque
  • Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech5,500 rpm1,750 rpm5,750 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.0 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.0 s
64.9 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
181 hp
135 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X has 5 hp more than Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech.

The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1,490 kg
3,285 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
222 km/h
138 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech8.0 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X8.7 s

Although Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X has more power, Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
679 km
422 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
836 km
520 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
181 hp
135 kW
8.0 s
222 km/h
138 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
8.7 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,447 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
8.0 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
181 hp
135 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.0 s
8.7 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,429 kg
3,150 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,447 mm
175.1 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
679 km
422 mi
836 km
520 mi
Trunk score
520 L
18.4 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePeugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 61 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 90 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 157 km (97 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 PureTech
1.2 PureTech
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1.6 PureTech
20d
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsBMWX2 (F39)20d
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1.6 PureTech
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1.6 PureTech
GLB 220d
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
1.6 PureTech
1.2
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsPeugeot2008 IIFacelift 20231.2
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
350h
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
1.6 PureTech
Cooper S 2.0
VS
Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTechvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper S 2.0
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X - car comparison - FastVsFaster