Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0vsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2023
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    226 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,133 km
    704 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
190hp142kW
186hp139kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,535kg3,384lb
1,465kg3,230lb
Gross weight
2,105kg4,641lb
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
83.6s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
73.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.3s
0-200 km/h
35.3s
Calculated
61.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,133km704mi
Calculated
895km556mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,297mm169in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
180mm7in
Trunk volume
450L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
51L
CO2 emissions
117g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv XPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.3 s
61.6 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW

Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0 has 4 hp more than Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X and Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
1,465 kg
3,230 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
226 km/h
140 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0 and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0 and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
1,133 km
704 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
895 km
556 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
226 km/h
140 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
186 hp
139 kW
8.3 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,297 mm
169.2 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
7.9 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
Power
190 hp
142 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.3 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,297 mm
169.2 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
1,133 km
704 mi
895 km
556 mi
CO2 score
117 g/km
-
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 160 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 239 km (148 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 20 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X

  • Is 70 kg lighter
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020 Cooper SD 2.0 vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv X - car comparison - FastVsFaster