Car comparison

Maybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010 6.0 V12vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010

6.0 V12

630 hp5980 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2010-2013
VS

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212)

AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO

525 hp5461 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2011-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.3 s
  • Lightest
    1,765 kg
    3,891 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    297 hp/t
    222 kW/t
    3.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    82/100
  • Best performance score
    85/100
  • Best economy score
    81/100

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12

  • Fastest top speed
    290 km/h
    180 mph Unrestricted
    275 km/h
    171 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    630 hp
    470 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,000 Nm
    738 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    696 km
    433 mi
  • Largest trunk
    605 L
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Power
630hp470kW
525hp391kW
Torque
1,000Nm738lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
2,780kg6,129lb
1,765kg3,891lb
Gross weight
3,380kg7,452lb
2,390kg5,269lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
62.2s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph
Calculated
38.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.1s
4.3s
0-200 km/h
14.8s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.9s
Calculated
4.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
24.6L/100 km9.6mpg US11.5mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
12.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb
Calculated
297hp/t222kW/t135hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
360Nm/t241lb-ft/ton
Calculated
397Nm/t265lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
696km433mi
Calculated
673km418mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,980cc365cu in
5,461cc333cu in
Length
6,171mm243in
4,868mm192in
Width
1,980mm78in
1,854mm73in
Height
1,573mm62in
1,471mm58in
Wheelbase
3,827mm151in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,675mm66in
1,598mm63in
Rear track
1,695mm67in
1,614mm64in
Trunk volume
605L
532L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
110L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOPowerTorque
  • Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V124,800-5,100 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,350 rpm
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO5,250-5,750 rpm1,750-5,000 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.9 s
4.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.1 s
4.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.8 s
12.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.7 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
10.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
12.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
187 km/h
116 mph
199 km/h
124 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
630 hp
470 kW
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
525 hp
391 kW

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 has 105 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO and Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: 105 hp (78 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
2,780 kg
6,129 lb
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
1,765 kg
3,891 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V125.1 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO4.3 s

Although Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO and Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO and Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12: 6.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
297 hp/t
222 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
696 km
433 mi
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
673 km
418 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
630 hp
470 kW
5.1 s
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
525 hp
391 kW
4.3 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
6,171 mm
243.0 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Power
525 hp
391 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
532 L
18.8 cu ft
Length
4,868 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
Power
630 hp
470 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Power
525 hp
391 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
5.1 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
4.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
297 hp/t
222 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Power
630 hp
470 kW
525 hp
391 kW
Torque
1,000 Nm
738 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.1 s
4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
290 km/h180 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
2,780 kg
6,129 lb
1,765 kg
3,891 lb
Fuel consumption
15.8 L/100 km
14.9 mpg US
17.9 mpg UK
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
6,171 mm
243.0 in
Height
1,573 mm
61.9 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
532 L
18.8 cu ft
Length
4,868 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in
Range score
696 km
433 mi
673 km
418 mi
Trunk score
605 L
21.4 cu ft
532 L
18.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
227 hp/t
169 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
297 hp/t
222 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Consumption15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km27.65 LC100 km17.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi44.50 LC100 mi27.60 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,148 LC/year2,573 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Maybach 62 S (V240) Facelift 2010 6.0 V12

  • Has 105 hp more
  • Has 300 Nm more
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 23 km (14 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 73 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO

  • Is 1,015 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 6.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 71 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maybach 62 S (V240) 6.0 V12
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

6.0 V12
Speed 6.0i W12
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsBentleyContinental Flying SpurSpeed 6.0i W12
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
6.0 V12
6.0 W12
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsBentleyFlying Spur II6.0 W12
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006AMG E 63 V8
6.0 V12
AMG S 63 V8
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsMercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009AMG S 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 V8
6.0 V12
V 6.2 V8
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsCadillacCTS IIV 6.2 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
AMG E 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8
6.0 V12
6.3 FSI W12
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsAUDIA8L (D4/4H)6.3 FSI W12
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
AMG E 53
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53
6.0 V12
760i
VS
Maybach62 S (V240)Facelift 20106.0 V12vsBMW7 Series (F01 LCI)Facelift 2012760i
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
E 500 BlueEFFICIENCY V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBOvsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)E 500 BlueEFFICIENCY V8
Maybach 62 S (V240) · Facelift 2010 6.0 V12 vs Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO - car comparison - FastVsFaster