Maserati Quattroporte IV
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 BiturbovsMercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W202)
AMG C 36
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Most powerful287 hp214 kW
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score79/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Highest torque385 Nm284 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 287hp214kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 362Nm267lb-ft | 385Nm284lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 1,945kg4,288lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.0s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.3s Calculated | 20.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 3,606cc220cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,487mm177in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,720mm68in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,385mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,690mm106in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,497mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,500mm59in | 1,478mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 6,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.3 s | 20.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 168 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 287 hp 214 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 and Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 5.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 287 hp 214 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 287 hp 214 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Has 23 Nm more
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























