Maserati Grecale · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
Maserati Grecale · Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0vsMaserati Grecale GT 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Grecale
GT 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful330 hp246 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight174 hp/t130 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk535 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Maserati Grecale GT 2.0
- Lightest1,870 kg4,123 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range719 km447 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 330hp246kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 70.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.5s Calculated | 23.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 688km428mi Calculated | 719km447mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,873mm192in | 4,846mm191in |
| Width | 1,947mm77in | 2,163mm85in |
| Height | 1,687mm66in | 1,670mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,901mm114in | 2,901mm114in |
| Front track | 1,620mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,692mm67in | - |
| Trunk volume | 535L | 535L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0: Power / Torque
- Maserati Grecale GT 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 5,750 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 | 5,750 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.5 s | 23.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 330 hp 246 kW |
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0 has 30 hp more than Maserati Grecale GT 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Grecale GT 2.0 and Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 5.3 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 | 5.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0 and Maserati Grecale GT 2.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 688 km 428 mi |
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 | 719 km 447 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.6 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | MaseratiGrecaleGT 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 330 hp 246 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 688 km 428 mi | 719 km 447 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0 | Maserati Grecale GT 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0
- Has 30 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Maserati Grecale GT 2.0
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























