Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 2.0 TSIvsMaserati Grecale · Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Grecale · Facelift 2026
Modena 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful333 hp248 kW
- Lightest1,566 kg3,452 lb
- Best power-to-weight213 hp/t159 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score83/100
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best estimated range688 km428 mi
- Largest trunk535 L
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333hp248kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,566kg3,452lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 64.1s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 19.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 213hp/t159kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 618km384mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,451mm175in | 4,873mm192in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,947mm77in |
| Height | 1,511mm59in | 1,687mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,901mm114in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,620mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,692mm67in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 535L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 5,600-6,500 rpm | 2,100-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 5,750 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 19.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 333 hp 248 kW |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 330 hp 246 kW |
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI has 3 hp more than Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0 and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 1,566 kg 3,452 lb |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 4.8 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI and Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 618 km 384 mi |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 333 hp 248 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI | MaseratiGrecaleFacelift 2026Modena 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp 248 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,566 kg 3,452 lb | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 618 km 384 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI | Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 329 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Grecale Facelift 2026 Modena 2.0
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 70 km (44 mi) more estimated range
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























