Maserati GranTurismo I
Car comparison
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32VvsWiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann GT MF4
S 4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Lightest1,370 kg3,020 lb
- Best power-to-weight307 hp/t229 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.2 L/100 km13.7 mpg US16.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range569 km354 mi
- Best economy score74/100
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph
- Most powerful440 hp328 kW
- Highest torque490 Nm361 lb-ft
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 440hp328kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 490Nm361lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 1,370kg3,020lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.1s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 57.2s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.7s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.8L/100 km9.1mpg US10.9mpg UK | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 307hp/t229kW/t139hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 531km330mi Calculated | 569km354mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 3,999cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,881mm192in | 4,230mm167in |
| Width | 1,915mm75in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,353mm53in | 1,190mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,942mm116in | 2,507mm99in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 260L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 275g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.7 s | 13.0 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 440 hp 328 kW |
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V has 20 hp more than Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 293 km/h 182 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 4.4 s |
Although Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V has more power, Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK |
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 531 km 330 mi |
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 569 km 354 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 440 hp 328 kW | 4.9 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.4 s | 293 km/h 182 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V |
| 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK |
| WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 440 hp 328 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 531 km 330 mi | 569 km 354 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 275 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 307 hp/t 229 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V | Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.2 L/100 km14.5 mpg US17.4 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 28.35 LC100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 45.62 LC100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,430 L642 US gal535 UK gal | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,253 LC/year | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8
- Is 510 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 73 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 38 km (24 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























