Car comparison

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8vsJaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Wiesmann GT MF4

S 4.0 V8

420 hp3999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2003-2014
VS

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150)

R 4.2 V8

416 hp4196 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2006-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    293 km/h
    182 mph
  • Most powerful
    420 hp
    313 kW
  • Lightest
    1,370 kg
    3,020 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    307 hp/t
    229 kW/t
    3.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.3 L/100 km
    19.1 mpg US
    23.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.2 L/100 km
    13.7 mpg US
    16.4 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    78/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8

  • Highest torque
    560 Nm
    413 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    578 km
    359 mi
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best practicality score
    47/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelWiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
Power
420hp313kW
416hp310kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
560Nm413lb-ft
Curb weight
1,370kg3,020lb
1,695kg3,737lb
Gross weight
1,620kg3,571lb
2,080kg4,586lb
Top speed
293 km/h
182 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
57.2s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph
Calculated
68.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.4s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
13.0s
Calculated
17.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.2s
Calculated
4.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK
19.1L/100 km12.3mpg US14.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
13.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
307hp/t229kW/t139hp/1000 lb
Calculated
245hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
569km354mi
Calculated
578km359mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,999cc244cu in
4,196cc256cu in
Length
4,230mm167in
4,791mm189in
Width
1,880mm74in
-
Height
1,190mm47in
1,322mm52in
Wheelbase
2,507mm99in
2,752mm108in
Ground clearance-
120mm5in
Trunk volume-
300L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
70L
71L
CO2 emissions
275g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V88,300 rpm3,900 rpm8,550 rpm
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V86,250 rpm4,000 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricWiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.2 s
4.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.4 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.0 s
17.8 s
Top speed
293 km/h
182 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
13.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
195 km/h
121 mph
176 km/h
109 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
420 hp
313 kW
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
416 hp
310 kW

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 has 4 hp more than Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8 and Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
560 Nm
413 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
1,370 kg
3,020 lb
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
1,695 kg
3,737 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
293 km/h
182 mph
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V84.4 s
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V85.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
245 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
569 km
354 mi
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
578 km
359 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
420 hp
313 kW
4.4 s
293 km/h
182 mph
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
416 hp
310 kW
5.2 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
Power
420 hp
313 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
293 km/h
182 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,190 mm
46.9 in
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
Power
416 hp
310 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,322 mm
52.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
Power
420 hp
313 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
293 km/h
182 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
Power
416 hp
310 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
4.4 s
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
245 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleWiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
Power
420 hp
313 kW
416 hp
310 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
560 Nm
413 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.4 s
5.2 s
Top speed
293 km/h
182 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,370 kg
3,020 lb
1,695 kg
3,737 lb
Fuel consumption
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,190 mm
46.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,322 mm
52.0 in
Range score
569 km
354 mi
578 km
359 mi
CO2 score
275 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
307 hp/t
229 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
245 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleWiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8
Consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.53 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.64 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,229 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 325 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 28 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 61 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8

  • Has 160 Nm more
  • Has 9 km (6 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

S 4.0 V8
GT3 RS 3.6
VS
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8vsPorsche911 (997)GT3 RS 3.6
R 4.2 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
4.0 V8
VS
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8vsBMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
S 4.0 V8
6.0 i V12 48V
VS
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8vsAston MartinDB9 Coupe6.0 i V12 48V
R 4.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
GT3 RS 3.8
VS
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8vsPorsche911 (997)Facelift 2008GT3 RS 3.8
R 4.2 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 20095.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
S 4.7 i V8 32V
VS
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8vsMaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
R 4.2 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
S 4.0 V8
AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
VS
WiesmannGT MF4S 4.0 V8vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
R 4.2 V8
3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8vsJaguarC-X163.0 V6
Wiesmann GT MF4 S 4.0 V8 vs Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R 4.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster