Maserati GranCabrio II
Car comparison
Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6vsPorsche 718 Spyder (982) RS 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 718 Spyder (982)
RS 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6
- Fastest top speed316 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful542 hp404 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range660 km410 mi
- Largest trunk131 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Porsche 718 Spyder (982) RS 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Lightest1,410 kg3,109 lb
- Best power-to-weight355 hp/t264 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 542hp404kW | 500hp373kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,410kg3,109lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.3s99% target: 313 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 63.1s99% target: 305 km/h / 189 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.2s | 10.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 355hp/t264kW/t161hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 343Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated | 319Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 660km410mi Calculated | 415km258mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,992cc183cu in | 3,996cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,966mm196in | 4,418mm174in |
| Width | 1,957mm77in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,365mm54in | 1,252mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,929mm115in | 2,482mm98in |
| Front track | 1,646mm65in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,660mm65in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 79mm3in |
| Trunk volume | 131L | 120L |
| Max trunk volume | 172L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 54L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Porsche 718 Spyder (982) RS 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 | 8,400 rpm | 6,750 rpm | 9,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.2 s | 10.9 s |
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 542 hp 404 kW |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 | 500 hp 373 kW |
Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6 has 42 hp more than Porsche 718 Spyder (982) RS 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Spyder (982) RS 4.0 and Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6: 42 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 | 308 km/h 191 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 3.6 s |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 | 3.4 s |
Although Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6 has more power, Porsche 718 Spyder (982) RS 4.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Spyder (982) RS 4.0 and Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6 and Porsche 718 Spyder (982) RS 4.0: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 | 355 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 660 km 410 mi |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 | 415 km 258 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 542 hp 404 kW | 3.6 s | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 | 500 hp 373 kW | 3.4 s | 308 km/h 191 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 |
| 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 | 355 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | Porsche718 Spyder (982)RS 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 542 hp 404 kW | 500 hp 373 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 316 km/h 196 mph | 308 km/h 191 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 660 km 410 mi | 415 km 258 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 131 L 4.6 cu ft | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 355 hp/t 264 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6 | Porsche 718 Spyder (982) RS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK | 13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.55 LC100 km | 22.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi | 36.61 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal | 1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,783 LC/year | 3,413 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6
- Has 42 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 245 km (152 mi) more estimated range
- Has 11 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Porsche 718 Spyder (982) RS 4.0
- Is 485 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 69 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























