Bentley Continental GTC III
Car comparison
Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8vsMaserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati GranCabrio II
Trofeo 3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed318 km/h198 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque770 Nm568 lb-ft
- Best estimated range769 km478 mi
- Largest trunk235 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Lightest1,895 kg4,178 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 542hp404kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,335kg5,148lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Gross weight | 2,800kg6,173lb | - |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.1s99% target: 315 km/h / 196 mph Calculated | 83.3s99% target: 313 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 3.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 12.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.6L/100 km14.2mpg US17.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated | 343Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 2,992cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 4,966mm196in |
| Width | 1,964mm77in | 1,957mm77in |
| Height | 1,399mm55in | 1,365mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | 2,929mm115in |
| Front track | 1,672mm66in | 1,646mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,664mm66in | 1,660mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 235L | 131L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 172L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 3.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 12.2 s |
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 120 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 542 hp 404 kW |
Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8 has 8 hp more than Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6 and Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 2,335 kg 5,148 lb |
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 316 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 4.1 s |
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 3.6 s |
Although Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8 has more power, Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6 and Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6 and Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 769 km 478 mi |
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 660 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.1 s | 318 km/h 198 mph |
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 542 hp 404 kW | 3.6 s | 316 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyContinental GTC III4.0 V8 | MaseratiGranCabrio IITrofeo 3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 542 hp 404 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 3.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 318 km/h 198 mph | 316 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,335 kg 5,148 lb | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | 131 L 4.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8 | Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Continental GTC III 4.0 V8
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 109 km (68 mi) more estimated range
- Has 104 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Maserati GranCabrio II Trofeo 3.0 V6
- Is 440 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 50 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























