Maserati GranCabrio I
Car comparison
Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8vsMaserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Spyder
4.2 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption22.5 L/100 km10.5 mpg US12.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best economy score68/100
- Best practicality score40/100
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best estimated range553 km344 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 390hp291kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 451Nm333lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 72.5s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 517km321mi Calculated | 553km344mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 4,244cc259cu in |
| Length | 4,881mm192in | 4,303mm169in |
| Width | 1,915mm75in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,353mm53in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,942mm116in | 2,440mm96in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,538mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 173L | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 88L |
| CO2 emissions | 337g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
- Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.2 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW |
Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8 has 60 hp more than Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V and Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | 1,980 kg 4,365 lb |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 283 km/h 176 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | 5.2 s |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 5.0 s |
Although Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8 has more power, Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V and Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8 and Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | 517 km 321 mi |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 553 km 344 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 5.2 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW | 5.0 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 |
| 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
| 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranCabrio I4.7 V8 | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 390 hp 291 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,980 kg 4,365 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 517 km 321 mi | 553 km 344 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 337 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 173 L 6.1 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8 | Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK | 15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km | 27.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi | 44.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal | 2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year | 4,174 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranCabrio I 4.7 V8
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 59 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 36 km (23 mi) more estimated range
- Has 127 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























