Maserati GranTurismo I
Car comparison
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7vsMaserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Coupe
4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph
- Most powerful440 hp328 kW
- Highest torque490 Nm361 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight234 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.2 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption23.2 L/100 km10.1 mpg US12.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.6 L/100 km22.3 mpg US26.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range565 km351 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score66/100
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Lightest1,670 kg3,682 lb
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 440hp328kW | 390hp291kW |
| Torque | 490Nm361lb-ft | 451Nm333lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 1,670kg3,682lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 70.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.2s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.2L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.6L/100 km22.3mpg US26.8mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 234hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 565km351mi Calculated | 553km344mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 4,244cc259cu in |
| Length | 4,881mm192in | 4,523mm178in |
| Width | 2,056mm81in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,353mm53in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,942mm116in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,538mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 315L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 88L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7: Power / Torque
- Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.2 s | 15.7 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | 440 hp 328 kW |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW |
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 has 50 hp more than Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | 5.0 s |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
Although Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 has more power, Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | 15.2 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 and Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | 565 km 351 mi |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 553 km 344 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | 440 hp 328 kW | 5.0 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.9 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 |
| 15.2 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
| 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | 15.2 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 15.2 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 | MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 440 hp 328 kW | 390 hp 291 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.2 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 565 km 351 mi | 553 km 344 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 | Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.2 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK | 15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.65 LC100 km | 27.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.89 LC100 mi | 44.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,285 L604 US gal503 UK gal | 2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,998 LC/year | 4,174 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 39 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 11 km (7 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























