Maserati Coupe
Car comparison
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32VvsBMW M3 Coupe (E46) CSL 3.2i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Coupe (E46)
CSL 3.2i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW M3 Coupe (E46) CSL 3.2i 24V
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight275 hp/t205 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.8 L/100 km13.2 mpg US15.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Largest trunk410 L
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Most powerful390 hp291 kW
- Highest torque451 Nm333 lb-ft
- Best estimated range553 km344 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 360hp268kW |
| Torque | 451Nm333lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.4s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 59.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.6s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK | 17.8L/100 km13.2mpg US15.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 275hp/t205kW/t125hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 553km344mi Calculated | 529km329mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,244cc259cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,523mm178in | 4,492mm177in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,305mm51in | 1,372mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,731mm108in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,508mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,525mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 315L | 410L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Coupe (E46) CSL 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.6 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 181 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V | 360 hp 268 kW |
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V has 30 hp more than BMW M3 Coupe (E46) CSL 3.2i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E46) CSL 3.2i 24V and Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V | 4.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Coupe (E46) CSL 3.2i 24V and Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V: 4.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 553 km 344 mi |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V | 529 km 329 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.9 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
| 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW M3 Coupe (E46) CSL 3.2i 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | BMWM3 Coupe (E46)CSL 3.2i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 360 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 553 km 344 mi | 529 km 329 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 275 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | BMW M3 Coupe (E46) CSL 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.83 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.78 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,174 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 81 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 km (15 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW M3 Coupe (E46) CSL 3.2i 24V
- Is 360 kg lighter
- Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























