Maserati Ghibli I (AM115)
Car comparison
Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8vsMaserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Coupe
4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Highest torque461 Nm340 lb-ft
- Lightest1,651 kg3,640 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.7 L/100 km15.0 mpg US18.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range637 km396 mi
- Largest trunk680 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best economy score65/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Most powerful390 hp291 kW
- Best power-to-weight234 hp/t174 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 335hp250kW | 390hp291kW |
| Torque | 461Nm340lb-ft | 451Nm333lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,651kg3,640lb | 1,670kg3,682lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.2s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 70.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.2s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 234hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 637km396mi Calculated | 553km344mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,930cc301cu in | 4,244cc259cu in |
| Length | 4,690mm185in | 4,523mm178in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,160mm46in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,440mm57in | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,420mm56in | 1,538mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 680L | 315L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 88L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.2 s | 15.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 335 hp 250 kW |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW |
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V has 55 hp more than Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8 and Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V: 55 hp (41 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 1,651 kg 3,640 lb |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 5.3 s |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V and Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 637 km 396 mi |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 553 km 344 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 335 hp 250 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.9 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
| 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
| MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGhibli I (AM115)SS 5.0 V8 | MaseratiCoupe4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 335 hp 250 kW | 390 hp 291 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 461 Nm 340 lb-ft | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,651 kg 3,640 lb | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 637 km 396 mi | 553 km 344 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8 | Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK | 15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.47 LC100 km | 27.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.22 LC100 mi | 44.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal | 2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,121 LC/year | 4,174 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Ghibli I (AM115) SS 5.0 V8
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 19 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 83 km (52 mi) more estimated range
- Has 365 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Maserati Coupe 4200 GT 4.2i V8 32V
- Has 55 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























