Lynk & Co Z10
Car comparison
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWhvsMercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 500 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE (V295)
EQE 500 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,318 kg5,110 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk616 L
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score80/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 500 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Most powerful449 hp335 kW
- Highest torque858 Nm633 lb-ft
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 422hp315kW | 449hp335kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 858Nm633lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,318kg5,110lb | 2,605kg5,743lb |
| Gross weight | 2,713kg5,981lb | 3,035kg6,691lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.0s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 36.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s Calculated | 16.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 172hp/t129kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 329Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,028mm198in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 1,966mm77in | 1,961mm77in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,510mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,005mm118in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,703mm67in | 1,633mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,713mm67in | 1,642mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 129mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 616L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 16.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 422 hp 315 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | 449 hp 335 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 500 100 kWh has 27 hp more than Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 500 100 kWh: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 2,318 kg 5,110 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | 2,605 kg 5,743 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 5.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 500 100 kWh and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 1.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | 172 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 422 hp 315 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 422 hp 315 kW | 449 hp 335 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,318 kg 5,110 lb | 2,605 kg 5,743 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 616 L 21.8 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 172 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
- Is 287 kg lighter
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 186 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 500 100 kWh
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 418 Nm more
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























