Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020 AMG E 53vsMercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 500 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE (V295)
EQE 500 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight232 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 500 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Most powerful449 hp335 kW
- Highest torque858 Nm633 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 435hp324kW | 449hp335kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 858Nm633lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 2,605kg5,743lb |
| Gross weight | 2,495kg5,501lb | 3,035kg6,691lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 42.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 36.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.2s Calculated | 16.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 172hp/t129kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 329Nm/t220lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,999cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,940mm194in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,961mm77in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,510mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,633mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,595mm63in | 1,642mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 200g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.2 s | 16.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 435 hp 324 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | 449 hp 335 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 500 100 kWh has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53 and Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 500 100 kWh: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | 2,605 kg 5,743 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 500 100 kWh and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | 172 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 435 hp 324 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 500 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 435 hp 324 kW | 449 hp 335 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 858 Nm 633 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 2,605 kg 5,743 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 200 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 172 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53
- Is 730 kg lighter
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 60 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 500 100 kWh
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 338 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























