Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43vsLynk & Co Z10 95 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)

AMG C 43

408 hp1991 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2022-2024
VS

Lynk & Co Z10

95 kWh

422 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSedan2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,735 kg
    3,825 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    235 hp/t
    175 kW/t
    4.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    76/100
  • Best performance score
    77/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Power
408hp304kW
422hp315kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight
1,735kg3,825lb
2,318kg5,110lb
Gross weight
2,350kg5,181lb
2,713kg5,981lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
41.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
55.0s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
13.2s
Calculated
18.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.4s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb
Calculated
182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton
Calculated
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
538km334mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
-
Length
4,791mm189in
5,028mm198in
Width
1,824mm72in
1,966mm77in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,468mm58in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
3,005mm118in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,703mm67in
Rear track
1,602mm63in
1,713mm67in
Ground clearance-
129mm5in
Trunk volume
455L
616L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.2 s
18.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.6 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.4 s
13.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
195 km/h
121 mph
175 km/h
109 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43
408 hp
304 kW
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
422 hp
315 kW

Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43 and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
440 Nm
325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
2,318 kg
5,110 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 434.6 s
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh5.9 s

Although Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43 and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 1.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43
408 hp
304 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
422 hp
315 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43
Power
408 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Power
422 hp
315 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,028 mm
198.0 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Power
408 hp
304 kW
422 hp
315 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
2,318 kg
5,110 lb
Fuel consumption
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,791 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,028 mm
198.0 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Range score
538 km
334 mi
-
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
235 hp/t
175 kW/t
4.3 kg/hp
182 hp/t
136 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43
Consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.19 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,441 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 583 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 53 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 161 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43 vs Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster