Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43vsLynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co Z10
95 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,735 kg3,825 lb
- Best power-to-weight243 hp/t181 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score82/100
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
- Most powerful422 hp315 kW
- Largest trunk616 L
- Best practicality score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 421hp314kW | 422hp315kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,735kg3,825lb | 2,318kg5,110lb |
| Gross weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | 2,713kg5,981lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 38.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 55.0s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.2s Calculated | 18.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 717km446mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,791mm189in | 5,028mm198in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,966mm77in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 3,005mm118in |
| Front track | 1,593mm63in | 1,703mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,713mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 129mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 616L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.2 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 199 km/h 124 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | 421 hp 314 kW |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 422 hp 315 kW |
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh has 1 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43 and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 2,318 kg 5,110 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | 4.3 s |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 5.9 s |
Although Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43 and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 1.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | 421 hp 314 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | 422 hp 315 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)AMG C 43 | Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 421 hp 314 kW | 422 hp 315 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | 2,318 kg 5,110 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 717 km 446 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 616 L 21.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) AMG C 43
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 583 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 61 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 161 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























