Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 63 S V8vsLynk & Co Z10 95 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)

AMG E 63 S V8

612 hp3982 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2020
VS

Lynk & Co Z10

95 kWh

789 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 63 S V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    850 Nm
    627 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,880 kg
    4,145 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    326 hp/t
    243 kW/t
    3.1 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    84/100
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Power
612hp456kW
789hp588kW
Torque
850Nm627lb-ft
810Nm597lb-ft
Curb weight
1,880kg4,145lb
2,468kg5,441lb
Gross weight
2,525kg5,567lb
2,888kg6,367lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
30.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
28.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.4s
3.5s
0-200 km/h
9.7s
Calculated
9.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.3s
Calculated
3.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.0s
Calculated
11.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
326hp/t243kW/t148hp/1000 lb
Calculated
320hp/t238kW/t145hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
452Nm/t303lb-ft/ton
Calculated
328Nm/t220lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
725km451mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
-
Length
4,988mm196in
5,028mm198in
Width
1,907mm75in
1,966mm77in
Height
1,463mm58in
1,468mm58in
Wheelbase
2,939mm116in
3,005mm118in
Front track
1,649mm65in
1,698mm67in
Rear track-
1,710mm67in
Ground clearance
130mm5in
142mm6in
Trunk volume
540L
616L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
-
CO2 emissions
207g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.3 s
3.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.4 s
3.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.7 s
9.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
5.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
7.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.3 s
9.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.0 s
11.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
212 km/h
132 mph
214 km/h
133 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8
612 hp
456 kW
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
789 hp
588 kW

Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh has 177 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 63 S V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 63 S V8 and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 177 hp (132 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8
850 Nm
627 lb-ft
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
810 Nm
597 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8
1,880 kg
4,145 lb
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
2,468 kg
5,441 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V83.4 s
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh3.5 s

Although Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 63 S V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 63 S V8 and Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh: 0.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8
326 hp/t
243 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
320 hp/t
238 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8
612 hp
456 kW
3.4 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
789 hp
588 kW
3.5 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8
Power
612 hp
456 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,988 mm
196.4 in
Height
1,463 mm
57.6 in
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Power
789 hp
588 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,028 mm
198.0 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8Lynk & CoZ1095 kWh
Power
612 hp
456 kW
789 hp
588 kW
Torque
850 Nm
627 lb-ft
810 Nm
597 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.4 s
3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,880 kg
4,145 lb
2,468 kg
5,441 lb
Fuel consumption
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,988 mm
196.4 in
Height
1,463 mm
57.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Length
5,028 mm
198.0 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Range score
725 km
451 mi
-
CO2 score
207 g/km
-
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
616 L
21.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
326 hp/t
243 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
320 hp/t
238 kW/t
3.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 63 S V8
Consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.63 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,389 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 63 S V8

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 588 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh

  • Has 177 hp more
  • Has 76 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 63 S V8
Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AMG E 63 S V8
AMG E 63 S
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
95 kWh
112 kWh
VS
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsPolestar5112 kWh
AMG E 63 S V8
AMG E 63 S V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 S V8
95 kWh
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
VS
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
AMG E 63 S V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
95 kWh
M70 105.7 kWh
VS
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsBMWi7 (G70)M70 105.7 kWh
AMG E 63 S V8
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006AMG E 63 V8
95 kWh
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsBMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020Competition 4.4 V8
AMG E 63 S V8
E 450
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 450
95 kWh
S 680 V12
VS
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)S 680 V12
AMG E 63 S V8
AMG E 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8
95 kWh
Competition 3.0
VS
Lynk & CoZ1095 kWhvsBMWM3 (G80 LCI)Facelift 2024Competition 3.0
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 63 S V8 vs Lynk & Co Z10 95 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster