Lynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo · Stage 3vsLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo · Stage 2vsLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo · Stage 1vsLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022
+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)
Lynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022
+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)
Lynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022
+ 2.0TD T5 Evo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3) 397 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed292 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful397 hp296 kW
- Highest torque589 Nm434 lb-ft
- Lightest1,645 kg3,627 lb
- Best power-to-weight242 hp/t180 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range625 km388 mi
- Largest trunk414 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 397hp296kW+132 hp | 344hp257kW+79 hp | 313hp233kW+48 hp | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 589Nm434lb-ft+209 Nm | 513Nm378lb-ft+133 Nm | 464Nm342lb-ft+84 Nm | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 271 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 45.2s99% target: 289 km/h / 180 mph-11.3 s Calculated | 51.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph-5.1 s Calculated | 51.6s99% target: 268 km/h / 167 mph-5.0 s Calculated | 56.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s-1.3 s | 4.8s-0.9 s | 5.1s-0.6 s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.8s-5.8 s Calculated | 13.3s-4.4 s Calculated | 15.0s-2.6 s Calculated | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.6s-0.8 s Calculated | 4.9s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s-1.5 s Calculated | 12.6s-1.0 s Calculated | 13.0s-0.6 s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 242hp/t180kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated | 209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated | 190hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton Calculated | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 625km388mi Calculated | 625km388mi Calculated | 625km388mi Calculated | 625km388mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,684mm184in | 4,684mm184in | 4,684mm184in | 4,684mm184in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,843mm73in | 1,843mm73in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,448mm57in | 1,448mm57in | 1,448mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,730mm107in | 2,730mm107in | 2,730mm107in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,587mm62in | 1,587mm62in | 1,587mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,587mm62in | 1,587mm62in | 1,587mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 132mm5in | 132mm5in | 132mm5in | 132mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 414L | 414L | 414L | 414L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L | 50L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3) 397 hp: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2) 344 hp: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1) 313 hp: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo 265 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.6 s | 4.9 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.8 s | 5.1 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.8 s | 13.3 s | 15.0 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 271 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.8 s | 5.9 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.5 s | 8.7 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.8 s | 11.1 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.6 s | 13.0 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | 397 hp 296 kW |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | 344 hp 257 kW |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | 313 hp 233 kW |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp | 265 hp 198 kW |
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3) 397 hp has 132 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo 265 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo 265 hp and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3) 397 hp: 132 hp (99 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | 589 Nm 434 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | 513 Nm 378 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | 464 Nm 342 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3) 397 hp and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo 265 hp: 1.3 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2) 344 hp and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1) 313 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | 242 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | 625 km 388 mi |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | 625 km 388 mi |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | 625 km 388 mi |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp | 625 km 388 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | 397 hp 296 kW | 4.4 s | 292 km/h 181 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | 344 hp 257 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | 313 hp 233 kW | 5.1 s | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3) 397 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | 242 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3)397 hp | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2)344 hp | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1)313 hp | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo265 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 397 hp 296 kW | 344 hp 257 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 589 Nm 434 lb-ft | 513 Nm 378 lb-ft | 464 Nm 342 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.8 s | 5.1 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 292 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 271 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 625 km 388 mi | 625 km 388 mi | 625 km 388 mi | 625 km 388 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 242 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 190 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3) 397 hp | Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2) 344 hp | Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 1) 313 hp | Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo 265 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 3) 397 hp
- Has 53 hp more
- Has 76 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo (Stage 2) 344 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























