Lynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 EvovsJaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
2.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,645 kg3,627 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score85/100
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Best estimated range831 km517 mi
- Largest trunk459 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 71.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s Calculated | 21.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 625km388mi Calculated | 831km517mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,684mm184in | 4,962mm195in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,982mm78in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,456mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,730mm107in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 132mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 414L | 459L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,484L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 74L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 21.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 265 hp 198 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo has 15 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 5.7 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 625 km 388 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 831 km 517 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co03Facelift 2022+ 2.0TD T5 Evo | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 625 km 388 mi | 831 km 517 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 + 2.0TD T5 Evo
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 206 km (128 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























