Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200vsLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)

C 200

204 hp1496 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2021-present
VS

Lynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022

2.0TD T4 Evo

218 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo

  • Most powerful
    218 hp
    163 kW
  • Highest torque
    325 Nm
    240 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,560 kg
    3,439 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    140 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    847 km
    527 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Largest trunk
    455 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Power
204hp152kW
218hp163kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
325Nm240lb-ft
Curb weight
1,630kg3,594lb
1,560kg3,439lb
Gross weight
2,320kg5,115lb
-
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
65.1s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
56.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
24.3s
Calculated
32.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
725km450mi
Calculated
847km527mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,496cc91cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,751mm187in
4,684mm184in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,843mm73in
Height
1,437mm57in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,730mm107in
Front track
1,601mm63in
1,597mm63in
Rear track
1,613mm64in
1,597mm63in
Ground clearance-
147mm6in
Trunk volume
455L
414L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 EvoPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 2005,800-6,100 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm6,350 rpm
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo5,000 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.3 s
32.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
161 km/h
100 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
204 hp
152 kW
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
218 hp
163 kW

Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
325 Nm
240 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
1,560 kg
3,439 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
241 km/h
150 mph
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 2007.1 s
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo7.2 s

Although Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
725 km
450 mi
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
847 km
527 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
204 hp
152 kW
7.1 s
241 km/h
150 mph
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
218 hp
163 kW
7.2 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,437 mm
56.6 in
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,684 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
7.1 s
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 Evo
Power
204 hp
152 kW
218 hp
163 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
325 Nm
240 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.2 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,630 kg
3,594 lb
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,437 mm
56.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,684 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
725 km
450 mi
847 km
527 mi
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 41 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 25 Nm more
  • Is 70 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 123 km (76 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD T4 Evo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0TD T4 Evo
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
C 200
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d
2.0TD T4 Evo
2.0d
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
2.0TD T4 Evo
380TSI
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsVolkswagenMagotan (B9)380TSI
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0TD T4 Evo
A 250
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)Facelift 2022A 250
C 200
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d
2.0TD T4 Evo
2.0d
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
C 200
C 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
2.0TD T4 Evo
320d
VS
Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T4 EvovsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 vs Lynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 2.0TD T4 Evo - car comparison - FastVsFaster