Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220dvsLynk & Co 03 2.0TD

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)

C 220d

200 hp1993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2021-present
VS

Lynk & Co 03

2.0TD

190 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2021-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    239 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    440 Nm
    325 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    833 km
    518 mi
  • Largest trunk
    455 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    74/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220dLynk & Co032.0TD
Power
200hp149kW
190hp142kW
Torque
440Nm325lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,705kg3,759lb
1,560kg3,439lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
68.1s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
63.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
25.9s
Calculated
29.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
833km518mi
Calculated
806km501mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,993cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,751mm187in
4,657mm183in
Width
1,820mm72in
1,840mm72in
Height
1,437mm57in
1,472mm58in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,730mm107in
Front track
1,582mm62in
1,597mm63in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,597mm63in
Ground clearance-
147mm6in
Trunk volume
455L
414L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
40L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220dLynk & Co 03 2.0TDPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d: Power / Torque
  • Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d4,200 rpm1,800-2,800 rpm4,450 rpm
Lynk & Co032.0TD4,700 rpm1,400-4,000 rpm4,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220dLynk & Co032.0TD
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.9 s
29.4 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
200 hp
149 kW
Lynk & Co032.0TD
190 hp
142 kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d has 10 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Lynk & Co032.0TD
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
1,705 kg
3,759 lb
Lynk & Co032.0TD
1,560 kg
3,439 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
239 km/h
149 mph
Lynk & Co032.0TD
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d7.4 s
Lynk & Co032.0TD7.4 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Lynk & Co032.0TD
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d and Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Lynk & Co032.0TD
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
833 km
518 mi
Lynk & Co032.0TD
806 km
501 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
200 hp
149 kW
7.4 s
239 km/h
149 mph
Lynk & Co032.0TD
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,437 mm
56.6 in
Lynk & Co032.0TD
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,472 mm
58.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Lynk & Co032.0TD
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
7.4 s
Lynk & Co032.0TD
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Lynk & Co032.0TD
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220dLynk & Co032.0TD
Power
200 hp
149 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.4 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,705 kg
3,759 lb
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,751 mm
187.0 in
Height
1,437 mm
56.6 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,657 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,472 mm
58.0 in
Range score
833 km
518 mi
806 km
501 mi
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220dLynk & Co 03 2.0TD
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 27 km (17 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 41 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD

  • Is 145 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d
Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 220d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0TD
320d
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20 LCI)Facelift 2022320d
C 220d
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 250d
2.0TD
E 200
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200
C 220d
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200
2.0TD
A 220
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)Facelift 2022A 220
C 220d
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 220d
2.0TD
320d
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20)320d
C 220d
C 250d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d
2.0TD
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI
C 220d
C 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220dvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
2.0TD
A 220d
VS
Lynk & Co032.0TDvsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)A 220d
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d vs Lynk & Co 03 2.0TD - car comparison - FastVsFaster