Car comparison

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 01

1.5 T3

180 hp1477 ccHybridFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph
  • Lightest
    1,769 kg
    3,900 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    102 hp/t
    76 kW/t
    9.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.6 L/100 km
    147.0 mpg US
    176.6 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co011.5 T3VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
180hp134kW
190hp142kW
Torque
265Nm195lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,769kg3,900lb
1,947kg4,292lb
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
77.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
88.0s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
47.0s
Calculated
67.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1.6L/100 km147mpg US176.6mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
150Nm/t100lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,078km670mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,477cc90cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,512mm178in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,857mm73in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,689mm66in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,734mm108in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,592mm63in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,597mm63in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
213mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume-
505L
Max trunk volume-
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
55L
CO2 emissions-
135g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co011.5 T35,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D44,250 rpm1,740-2,520 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co011.5 T3VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.0 s
67.7 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
180 hp
134 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has 10 hp more than Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3.

The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1,769 kg
3,900 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,947 kg
4,292 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
210 km/h
130 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T37.3 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D48.4 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 has more power, Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 3.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
180 hp
134 kW
7.3 s
210 km/h
130 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.4 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,512 mm
177.6 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
7.3 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.2 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co011.5 T3VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
180 hp
134 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
8.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,769 kg
3,900 lb
1,947 kg
4,292 lb
Fuel consumption
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,512 mm
177.6 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
-
1,078 km
670 mi
CO2 score
-
135 g/km
Trunk score
-
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 01 1.5 T3Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Consumption1.6 L/100 km147 mpg US176.6 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km2.80 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi4.51 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used240 L63 US gal53 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost420.00 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3

  • Is 178 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 135 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.5 T3
20d
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.0 D4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
1.5 T3
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.0 D4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
1.5 T3
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
1.5 T3
2.2 JTDM
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
2.0 D4
40 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
1.5 T3
330TSI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
1.5 T3
2.0 T4
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
1.5 T3
40 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
1.5 T3
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 D4
350h
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4vsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster