Car comparison

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3vsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 01

1.5 T3

180 hp1477 ccHybridFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Skyactiv-X

180 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Highest torque
    265 Nm
    195 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    1.6 L/100 km
    147.0 mpg US
    176.6 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co011.5 T3MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180hp134kW
180hp134kW
Torque
265Nm195lb-ft
224Nm165lb-ft
Curb weight
1,769kg3,900lb
1,467kg3,234lb
Gross weight-
1,965kg4,332lb
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
77.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
76.3s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
47.1s
Calculated
63.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
1.6L/100 km147mpg US176.6mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
150Nm/t100lb-ft/ton
Calculated
153Nm/t102lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,109km689mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,477cc90cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,512mm178in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,857mm73in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,689mm66in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,734mm108in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,592mm63in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,597mm63in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
213mm8in
175mm7in
Trunk volume-
430L
Max trunk volume-
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
51L
CO2 emissions-
105g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XPowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co011.5 T35,500 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X6,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co011.5 T3MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.1 s
63.7 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
180 hp
134 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
224 Nm
165 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1,769 kg
3,900 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1,467 kg
3,234 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
210 km/h
130 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T37.3 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X8.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 1.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 3.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
180 hp
134 kW
7.3 s
210 km/h
130 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
8.5 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,512 mm
177.6 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
7.3 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co011.5 T3
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co011.5 T3MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
8.5 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,769 kg
3,900 lb
1,467 kg
3,234 lb
Fuel consumption
1.6 L/100 km
147.0 mpg US
176.6 mpg UK
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,512 mm
177.6 in
Height
1,689 mm
66.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
-
1,109 km
689 mi
CO2 score
-
105 g/km
Trunk score
-
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 01 1.5 T3Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Consumption1.6 L/100 km147 mpg US176.6 mpg UK4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km2.80 LC100 km8.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi4.51 LC100 mi12.96 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used240 L63 US gal53 UK gal690 L182 US gal152 UK gal
Annual fuel cost420.00 LC/year1,208 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3

  • Has 41 Nm more
  • Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Is 302 kg lighter
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.5 T3
20d
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1.5 T3
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1.5 T3
2.0 TSI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1.5 T3
2.2 JTDM
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
1.5 T3
40 TDI
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.0 Skyactiv-X
330TSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
1.5 T3
2.0 D4
VS
Lynk & Co011.5 T3vsVolvoXC402.0 D4
2.0 Skyactiv-X
1.6 PureTech
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsPeugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech
Lynk & Co 01 1.5 T3 vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X - car comparison - FastVsFaster