Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 4.0vsLotus Evora GT 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora GT
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,408 kg3,104 lb
- Best power-to-weight295 hp/t220 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score70/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 4.0
- Fastest top speed302 km/h188 mph
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range627 km390 mi
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 416hp310kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,408kg3,104lb |
| Gross weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | - |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.8s99% target: 299 km/h / 186 mph Calculated | 52.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.4s | 11.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 290hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated | 295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 297Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 627km390mi Calculated | 470km292mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,995cc244cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,456mm175in | 4,394mm173in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,972mm78in |
| Height | 1,269mm50in | 1,223mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,484mm98in | - |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,534mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 270L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 273g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 4.0: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | 7,600 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | - | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.4 s | 11.6 s |
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW |
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 4.0 has 4 hp more than Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 4.0: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 1,408 kg 3,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | 3.9 s |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 3.8 s |
Although Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 4.0 has more power, Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 4.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 4.0 and Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | 627 km 390 mi |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 470 km 292 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | 420 hp 313 kW | 3.9 s | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 4.0 | LotusEvora GT3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 416 hp 310 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 302 km/h 188 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,408 kg 3,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 627 km 390 mi | 470 km 292 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 273 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 4.0 | Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 4.0
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 157 km (98 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Lotus Evora GT 3.5 V6
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 42 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























