Lotus Evora Sport 410
Car comparison
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6vsLotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora 400
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph
- Most powerful410 hp306 kW
- Highest torque410 Nm302 lb-ft
- Lightest1,325 kg2,921 lb
- Best power-to-weight309 hp/t231 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions225 g/km
- Best estimated range619 km384 mi
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score81/100
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 410hp306kW | 406hp303kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,325kg2,921lb | 1,422kg3,135lb |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.2s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 58.0s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.4s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 309hp/t231kW/t140hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km384mi Calculated | 619km384mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | - | 4,394mm173in |
| Width | - | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | - | 1,229mm48in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,575mm101in |
| Front track | - | 1,564mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,575mm62in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 225g/km | 225g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500-6,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.4 s | 12.9 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 122 mph | 194 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW |
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 has 4 hp more than Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 and Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 1,325 kg 2,921 lb |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 4.2 s |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 4.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 309 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 410 hp 306 kW | 4.2 s | 300 km/h 186 mph |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | 309 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6 | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 410 hp 306 kW | 406 hp 303 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 300 km/h 186 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,325 kg 2,921 lb | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 384 mi | 619 km 384 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 225 g/km | 225 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 309 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 | Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 97 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























