Lotus Evora 400
Car comparison
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6vsAUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT RS Coupe (8S)
2.5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions192 g/km
- Best estimated range655 km407 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score84/100
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful406 hp303 kW
- Lightest1,422 kg3,135 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 406hp303kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 410Nm302lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,422kg3,135lb | 1,440kg3,175lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.0s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 45.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 278hp/t207kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 619km384mi Calculated | 655km407mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,394mm173in | 4,191mm165in |
| Width | 1,845mm73in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,229mm48in | 1,344mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,575mm101in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | 1,564mm62in | 1,564mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,543mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 305L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 712L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 225g/km | 192g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,500-6,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI | 5,850-7,000 rpm | 1,700-5,850 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 12.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW |
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 has 6 hp more than AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI and Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 4.2 s |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI | 3.7 s |
Although Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 has more power, AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI and Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI and Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI | 278 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 619 km 384 mi |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI | 655 km 407 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 406 hp 303 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI | 278 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora 4003.5 V6 | AUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 406 hp 303 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 619 km 384 mi | 655 km 407 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 225 g/km | 192 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 305 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 278 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6 | AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora 400 3.5 V6
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 18 kg lighter
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI TT RS Coupe (8S) 2.5 TFSI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 36 km (22 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 33 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























