Lotus Evora
Car comparison
Lotus Evora 3.5 V6vsRenault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane III Coupe
RS Trophy 2.0 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range732 km455 mi
- Largest trunk377 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score58/100
Lotus Evora 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed261 km/h162 mph
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Lightest1,382 kg3,047 lb
- Best power-to-weight203 hp/t151 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best performance score66/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEvora3.5 V6 | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 342Nm252lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,382kg3,047lb | 1,387kg3,058lb |
| Gross weight | 1,782kg3,929lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.5s99% target: 258 km/h / 161 mph Calculated | 82.9s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.3s Calculated | 22.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 203hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 191hp/t142kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 690km429mi Calculated | 732km455mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,456cc211cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,350mm171in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,848mm73in | 1,848mm73in |
| Height | 1,229mm48in | 1,435mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,575mm101in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,564mm62in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,557mm61in | 1,545mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 125mm5in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 377L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,024L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Evora 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 6,400 rpm | 4,700 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEvora3.5 V6 | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.3 s | 22.8 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 163 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 265 hp 198 kW |
Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 has 15 hp more than Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V and Lotus Evora 3.5 V6: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 4.9 s |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 and Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V and Lotus Evora 3.5 V6: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 690 km 429 mi |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 732 km 455 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 280 hp 209 kW | 4.9 s | 261 km/h 162 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.0 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEvora3.5 V6 | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEvora3.5 V6 | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS Trophy 2.0 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 342 Nm 252 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 261 km/h 162 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 690 km 429 mi | 732 km 455 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 377 L 13.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 203 hp/t 151 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Evora 3.5 V6 | Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.22 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,284 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Evora 3.5 V6
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Renault Megane III Coupe RS Trophy 2.0 16V
- Has 18 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
- Has 217 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























