Lotus Europa S
Car comparison
Lotus Europa S 2.0 16VvsMazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda RX-8
1.3 Wankel
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus Europa S 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Highest torque263 Nm194 lb-ft
- Lightest995 kg2,194 lb
- Best power-to-weight204 hp/t152 kW/t4.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score82/100
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Best estimated range545 km338 mi
- Largest trunk290 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 203hp151kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 263Nm194lb-ft | 211Nm156lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 995kg2,194lb | 1,379kg3,040lb |
| Gross weight | 1,066kg2,350lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.8s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 204hp/t152kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 153Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 473km294mi Calculated | 545km338mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,308cc80cu in |
| Length | 3,900mm154in | 4,430mm174in |
| Width | 1,714mm67in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,120mm44in | 1,340mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,330mm92in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,457mm57in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,490mm59in | 1,505mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 290L |
| Max trunk volume | 154L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 284g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lotus Europa S 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
- Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | 5,400 rpm | - | 5,650 rpm |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 8,200 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 9,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.8 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | 203 hp 151 kW |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 231 hp 172 kW |
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel has 28 hp more than Lotus Europa S 2.0 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Europa S 2.0 16V and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | 263 Nm 194 lb-ft |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 211 Nm 156 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | 995 kg 2,194 lb |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 1,379 kg 3,040 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | 5.8 s |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 6.4 s |
Although Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel has more power, Lotus Europa S 2.0 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Europa S 2.0 16V and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Europa S 2.0 16V and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | 473 km 294 mi |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 545 km 338 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | 203 hp 151 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Europa S 2.0 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LotusEuropa S2.0 16V | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 203 hp 151 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 263 Nm 194 lb-ft | 211 Nm 156 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 995 kg 2,194 lb | 1,379 kg 3,040 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 473 km 294 mi | 545 km 338 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 284 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 154 L 5.4 cu ft | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lotus Europa S 2.0 16V | Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lotus Europa S 2.0 16V
- Has 52 Nm more
- Is 384 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 72 km (44 mi) more estimated range
- Has 136 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























