AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3)
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.0 TDIvsMazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMazda RX-8
1.3 Wankel
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range913 km567 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
- Lightest1,379 kg3,040 lb
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t125 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 211Nm156lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,379kg3,040lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 73.1s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.9s Calculated | 26.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 153Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 913km567mi Calculated | 545km338mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 1,308cc80cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,430mm174in |
| Width | 1,854mm73in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,372mm54in | 1,340mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,751mm108in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,577mm62in | 1,505mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 290L |
| Max trunk volume | 829L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 284g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | 4,000-4,400 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 8,200 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 9,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.9 s | 26.8 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 231 hp 172 kW |
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.0 TDI has 9 hp more than Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel and AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.0 TDI: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 211 Nm 156 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 1,379 kg 3,040 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | 6.1 s |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.0 TDI and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.0 TDI and Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel: 4.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | 913 km 567 mi |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 545 km 338 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.1 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Coupe (8T3)3.0 TDI | MazdaRX-81.3 Wankel | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 211 Nm 156 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,379 kg 3,040 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 913 km 567 mi | 545 km 338 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 284 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 290 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.0 TDI | Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Coupe (8T3) 3.0 TDI
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 289 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 368 km (229 mi) more estimated range
- Has 165 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mazda RX-8 1.3 Wankel
- Is 231 kg lighter
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























